Monday, May 17, 2010
Data Dashboard for Maui District
I love dashboards! For example, if you do online banking with American Savings Bank, today you will find their new dashboard feature that gives you total and immediate access to all your account services. I would love to work with a tech guru to create a functional immediate access dashboard for Maui District that would allow us to keep the pulse of our compliance indicators and any other data we want to be reviewing daily. Anyone have an idea on a platform or means to keep the data current and available to many users?
Is Optometric Vision Therapy a Valid Treatment for Learning Disabilities
If you have interest in researching the validity of Optometric Vision Therapy the opening paragraph and conclusion from a research paper I wrote on this topic are pasted below. A Link to the full paper and references can be found by clicking this link. . Power Point Presentation can be found here.
Optometric Vision Therapy, also referred to as Vision Therapy, or Developmental Optometry, is based on the theory that misaligned or untrained vision can prevent written language from transmitting correctly and seamlessly to the brain for processing and thus causing learning disabilities. Vision therapists believe that many students and adults who struggle with learning and even those who are identified under IDEA as being eligible for special education as learning disabled or attention deficit have been misdiagnosed and are actually suffering from misaligned vision or convergence insufficiency (Press, 2002) (COVD, 2010). The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Ophthalmology finds the research touted by Developmental Optometrist to be flawed and emphasizes that learning disabilities are complex neurobiological deficits requiring multidisciplinary and phonological remediation techniques. (Pediatrics, 2009) This paper will explore the controversy over Vision therapy and make recommendations for educators and parents to consider.
Parents, Doctors and Educators should proceed very cautiously if considering vision therapy. Educators and Doctors are professionally required to rely on research based interventions and therefore should not make recommendations for vision therapy at this time. Developmental Optometrists would be wise to conduct the peer reviewed research that may validate their own successful findings. If vision therapy is indeed a successful remediation for learning disabilities, then Developmental Optometrists are cheating children and adults out of a successful future by not insisting on reliable data to validate their own claims. Parents should be wary of the “guru factor” associated with Vision Therapy. This term describes the alternative therapies that maintain a dedicated following without valid and reliable data to support efficacy of the therapy. For example, when the alternative therapy is not successful it is the fault of the client or of the clients parents – not of the therapy itself. And conversely, when the therapy succeeds, all other simultaneously administered remedies are ignored as contributing to success but the alternate therapy stands alone as the single successful factor.
Preventative, not reactive - a closer look at alternative placements
When I originally applied for the Professional Development Leave in October 2008, I was of the belief Maui District needed additional alternative placements for special education students. I was thinking of two groups – those who have been placed at Horizons Academy and our secondary aged students who have very low reading skills, are unmotivated and are behavior problems on campus. Now, as a result of my professional development, I have been exposed to new information and reached new conclusions that have changed my opinion on the need and the appropriateness of alternative special education placements for these groups of students.
Students who graduate from high school without successfully achieving a high school diploma and without having had access to general education curriculum are far less likely to secure life long meaningful work and or higher education post high school.Hawaii in particular has very poor outcomes in post school transition. Rather than removing students from the best environment in which to prepare them for a successful future, we should be researching, developing and implementing programs to prevent them from becoming school casualties who require alternative placements.
Students who graduate from high school without successfully achieving a high school diploma and without having had access to general education curriculum are far less likely to secure life long meaningful work and or higher education post high school.
In reviewing data from the years that I was most closely involved with the students at the Puunene ILC and Horizons Academy , I see there are common issues for these students. These are cultural difference, low reading ability, and behavior problems - mainly motivation and attention. Unless programs to address these core problems are in place at all schools we will continue to have students needing alternate placements.
I have come to believe that removing problem students from a campus without providing interventions to support and prevent the development of such behaviors in the first place is not only wrong but is also non-compliant to IDEA. It is like amputation of a limb due do a small cut being ignored, turning infectious, being ignored further or incorrectly treated and allowed to deteriorate until the only solution is cutting it away entirely. What is needed is long term solutions with research based quality interventions for reading and behavior, means to support student engagement and cultural competence.
I reached these opinions not only through the transition and intervention research I reviewed, but also in reading two books on leadership and change: “Switch – How to change things when change is hard” by Chris and Dan Heath and “Leadership and Self Deception – Getting out of the box” by The Arbinger Institute, and I became a reader of “Blog Maverick” by Mark Cuban, a leadership and business guru. All three teach how crucial it is to have vision for a new product or new direction when your customers are limited to an older or even current vision. Leadership is about being able to see the future and head for it when everyone around you is still in the present or the past. Using a business model example, it is not asking what your customers what they want - for they are unable to envision your future offerings - but to vision it for yourself and provide it to them. Using our own educational example, in October 2008 the principals of our secondary schools desperately wanted us to provide alternate placements; the focus of most of my early morning school meetings were on how to deal with disruptive students and their parents. Leadership however, demands us to take a step back and look at how to be preventative rather than reactive and work to build the supportive intervention programs that can end the cry for alternative placements and move the schools into the 21st century.
IDEA requires that all students with disabilities have access to the general curriculum and that targeted, consistent, research based interventions (academic – especially reading, assistive technology, behavioral interventions, and cultural awareness) are in place to support them. We know that in most of our schools many of our students are remain in special education classes receiving instruction in a highly modified content which is a complete departure from the general curriculum. Some reasons for this is lack of meaningful alternatives, tradition and lack of support for inclusive placements.
Therefore, I changed the focus of the grants written during my professional development leave to be supportive of a preventative future focus rather than addressing an immediate crisis, to prevent the need for alternative placements rather than to ignore the symptoms and provide only amputation, and to reach greater compliance to the intention of IDEA law. The focus of the grants are (1) Technology to Include All Children project to increase inclusion of special needs students in elementary schools, (2) Kuleana Connect Project to build engagement and support unmotivated learners in behavior an executive functioning and (3) the King Kekaulike Inclusion Achievement Project to include the first two along with an Inclusion Achievement Center approach to providing successful inclusion practices for all students.
Sunday, May 9, 2010
I Am Determined Transition Project
Parent information network from Missouri shared an excellent presentation on means to improve transition planning by engaging the student and their parents in the process and focusing on self-determination. It makes sense to me, that like everything else in life, that unless you have the buy-in, the involvement, the ownership, of the student in anything related to goals and goal attainment - you will fail to make meaningful gains. Children and youth are just like adults in wanting and needing to be an active participant in determining their path and their goals. How can we expect that youth transitioning from school would have meaningful transition plans that have the actual potential to work for them in learning the skills and developing the competencies they will need for transition to work and the world of adulthood (not to mention secondary school!) unless they have been not only present for the meeting and discussion, but are truly the "Chief Executive Officer" with the final say! Lets work to getting our kids involved and leading their transition IEP meetings and plans.
Suggestions on how to get students involved in their IEPs
I jumped off of the Missouri format and created this PPT:
Imua! Life After High School
Suggestions on how to get students involved in their IEPs
- Create invitations to the meeting
- Ahead of time make a list of strengths and challenges
- Work with the student to create a Power Point about themselves
- Plan the invitees, seating and how about a snack?
I jumped off of the Missouri format and created this PPT:
Imua! Life After High School
Pacific Rim Conference on Disabilities April 2010
I have attended the PAC RIM conference twice in years past. First time was when I was a student in the Center for Disability Studies (UH) Disability and Diversity post master's certificate program. The field of disability culture and studies was yet new to me in 2000 and attending the conference was helpful to me to gain a broader understanding of the field. I attended again after several years working in the field and further education and found that I was disappointed in the conference. The caliber of the conference seemed less than it deserved and less than Hawaii should be able to provide.
It was therefore with a somewhat critical outlook that I attended the PAC RIM conference this year, April 16 and 17, 2010 at the Hawaii Convention Center. I can say unequivocally, the conference far exceeded my expectations and was equal in diversity of information presented, quality of presenters, and professionalism of the overall exhibition to the national conferences I attended in Chicago (NASP) and Washington DC (AMHCP).
I will work to bring members of my staff to the conference next year. The six months professional leave I have been on has strongly convinced me of the great need we in Hawaii have to keep ourselves informed and updated on trends and movements in education. There is far too much excellent work and exciting changes going on that we will lag far behind on unless we increase our exposure to the field.
Please read my other new posts on five specific topics presented that I attended: The University of Arizona's SALT Center (secondary educational support for kids with special needs), Including Students with Low Cognitive Ability (DD) in regular education, Human Sexuality and CSHCN, Self - Determination to improve transition outcomes, Project Search on Transition Outcomes, and Online Autism Solutions.
It was therefore with a somewhat critical outlook that I attended the PAC RIM conference this year, April 16 and 17, 2010 at the Hawaii Convention Center. I can say unequivocally, the conference far exceeded my expectations and was equal in diversity of information presented, quality of presenters, and professionalism of the overall exhibition to the national conferences I attended in Chicago (NASP) and Washington DC (AMHCP).
I will work to bring members of my staff to the conference next year. The six months professional leave I have been on has strongly convinced me of the great need we in Hawaii have to keep ourselves informed and updated on trends and movements in education. There is far too much excellent work and exciting changes going on that we will lag far behind on unless we increase our exposure to the field.
Please read my other new posts on five specific topics presented that I attended: The University of Arizona's SALT Center (secondary educational support for kids with special needs), Including Students with Low Cognitive Ability (DD) in regular education, Human Sexuality and CSHCN, Self - Determination to improve transition outcomes, Project Search on Transition Outcomes, and Online Autism Solutions.
Website for Data on Children with Special Needs
At the AMCHP conference I learned about this website which is useful for gathering data for grant writing and other reasons to search for aggregate data on special needs children.
http://www.childhealthdata.org/content/Default.aspx
http://www.childhealthdata.org/content/Default.aspx
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)